Lerner & Rowe vs Suzuki Law Offices
Head-to-head across 1 shared market (Phoenix, AZ) — branded search demand, market rank, and which firm AI assistants actually recommend. Measured from Google Ads search volume at metro scope, refreshed monthly.
Which firm gets more branded searches?
Lerner & Rowe attracts more branded search demand — 1,970 vs 1,810 branded searches per month across the shared market. Branded searches are people typing the firm's name into Google rather than a generic phrase like "car accident lawyer."
| Market | Lerner & Rowe /mo | Suzuki Law Offices /mo | Share of demand |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phoenix, AZ | 1,970 #2 | 1,810 #3 | 5.4% · 5.0% |
Which firm do AI assistants recommend?
When AI assistants (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude) were asked to recommend an injury lawyer in Phoenix, AZ this month, Lerner & Rowe was named in 4 of 16 tested prompts, versus 0 for Suzuki Law Offices.
| AI recommendation instrument | Lerner & Rowe | Suzuki Law Offices |
|---|---|---|
| Named when AI assistants are asked to recommend an injury lawyer (November 2026) | 4 of 16 | 0 of 16 |
Branded search dominance and AI recommendations do not always agree. A firm can lead the search box and still go unnamed when someone asks an AI assistant which lawyer to call. Brand Defense tracks both, monthly — plus every advertiser detected bidding on each firm's name. Measure what's missing — $499/mo →
Firm profiles
Lerner & Rowe — full Brand Demand Profile →
Suzuki Law Offices — full Brand Demand Profile →
PlatinumProfile manages Google Business Profiles for personal injury firms — 30+ law firm offices under management. Check how your firm looks on the map.