Dunham & Jones vs Glasheen, Valles & Inderman Injury Lawyers
Head-to-head across 1 shared market (Lubbock, TX) — branded search demand, market rank, and which firm AI assistants actually recommend. Measured from Google Ads search volume at metro scope, refreshed monthly.
Which firm gets more branded searches?
Glasheen, Valles & Inderman Injury Lawyers attracts more branded search demand — 180 vs 140 branded searches per month across the shared market. Branded searches are people typing the firm's name into Google rather than a generic phrase like "car accident lawyer."
| Market | Dunham & Jones /mo | Glasheen, Valles & Inderman Injury Lawyers /mo | Share of demand |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lubbock, TX | 140 #4 | 180 #2 | 5.2% · 6.7% |
Which firm do AI assistants recommend?
When AI assistants (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude) were asked to recommend an injury lawyer in Lubbock, TX this month, Glasheen, Valles & Inderman Injury Lawyers was named in 9 of 16 tested prompts, versus 0 for Dunham & Jones.
| AI recommendation instrument | Dunham & Jones | Glasheen, Valles & Inderman Injury Lawyers |
|---|---|---|
| Named when AI assistants are asked to recommend an injury lawyer (September 2026) | 0 of 16 | 9 of 16 |
Branded search dominance and AI recommendations do not always agree. A firm can lead the search box and still go unnamed when someone asks an AI assistant which lawyer to call. Brand Defense tracks both, monthly — plus every advertiser detected bidding on each firm's name. Measure what's missing — $499/mo →
Firm profiles
Dunham & Jones — full Brand Demand Profile →
Glasheen, Valles & Inderman Injury Lawyers — full Brand Demand Profile →
PlatinumProfile manages Google Business Profiles for personal injury firms — 30+ law firm offices under management. Check how your firm looks on the map.